Default

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit. Quae nam consequatur reiciendis omnis esse, nesciunt!

Close Me

I AM A POPUP CUSTOM02

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit. Quae nam consequatur reiciendis omnis esse, nesciunt!

Close Me
Review Centers Need Rules That Fit
By Sharmaine De Guzman 23 Sep 2026 37

For thousands of Filipino students, passing an entrance or licensure examination can determine what comes next: admission to a university, a professional license, a first job, or even a new career. Behind this high-stakes process is a growing industry that deserves attention as part of the country’s education and business landscape.

 

Review centers are known to support examinees preparing for the UPCAT, professional licensure examinations, and the Bar. Yet the industry's place in the regulatory framework remains unclear.

 

Simply because their services are connected to education does not mean that they are degree-granting institutions. As discussed in a recent Manila Times article, the Supreme Court has ruled that the Commission on Higher Education's jurisdiction does not extend to independent review centers as it does to higher education institutions.

 

That does not mean review centers operate without rules. They remain businesses and must comply with laws on taxation, labor, consumer protection, data privacy, safety, and local permits.

 

The policy challenge is to avoid unnecessary supervision. Government should ensure reasonable standards without imposing requirements designed for schools that do not apply to review centers. Excessive regulation can increase costs and make services less accessible.

 

Students and families deserve truthful advertising, transparent fees, competent instructors, and honest claims about examination results. Review centers should not imply guaranteed success because actually passing depends on an examinee's individual preparation and performance.

 

Republic Act 10609 provides safeguards. It prohibits schools from forcing students to enroll in a particular review center, making enrollment a graduation requirement, imposing mandatory review fees, or withholding academic records to compel participation.

 

The objective should be straightforward: protect the student without unnecessarily burdening the business.

 

Review centers cannot replace good schools, nor should they be dismissed. They are businesses serving the students. Clear rules, fair competition, consistent enforcement, and accountability can allow the industry to grow while keeping the examinee at the center.

 

Related Reads


What's New

Opinion
23 Sep 2026 37

More Articles