Default

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit. Quae nam consequatur reiciendis omnis esse, nesciunt!

Close Me

I AM A POPUP CUSTOM02

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit. Quae nam consequatur reiciendis omnis esse, nesciunt!

Close Me
Does Knowing Me More Lead to Loving Me Less?
By Andrea Cherryl L. Bautista  23 Sep 2026 48

For centuries, the world has seen drastic developments and out-of-this-world innovations. Things have become so accessible that people can now snap their fingers to bring solutions to almost any need. Yet, these innovations have brought a lasting effect that, upon reflection, has pushed our supposedly advanced outlook backward. This is not because we have decided to ignore the roots of our dilemmas, but seemingly because, in the most Filipino way, being challenged or weak is viewed as a liability—a price that one simply cannot afford to pay.

 

In Filipino culture, where one is expected to be prim and proper in church on Sundays and productive on weekdays, it is as if we are programmed to believe that being “known”—revealing a mental diagnosis or struggle—will lead to being “loved less,” judged, or distanced. This brand of shame places a heavy cultural emphasis on transforming mental health disclosure from a path to healing into a social and economic liability, forcing individuals to pull back and struggle in silence.

 

At the heart of this silence lies the heavy weight of shame, or in Filipino, “Hiya,” a barrier that acts as a gatekeeper to our vulnerabilities. While Filipinos often pride themselves on the concept of shared identity or “Pakikipagkapwa,” there is an unspoken rule that certain parts of that identity are best kept hidden to preserve the family’s facade. And this is not a mere social theory or assumption; it is best viewed as a documented crisis of confidence. In fact, in the 2024 report by IDinsight, they found that while 62.4% of Filipinos surveyed agree that mental health conditions should not be a source of shame, an overwhelming disconnect exists in practice, as the data reveals that only 8.7% of those who experienced mental health issues actually sought professional care. 

 

So, what does this say? Well, it just sheds light on the gap between the terrifying reality that many Filipinos face: we may intellectually understand mental health, but we still instinctively fear that being “known” as someone who struggles will lead to being shunned. Just another way of looking at reputation as being the ultimate currency of families, but the irony is that many choose to suffer in the shadows rather than risk the social cost of a diagnosis. 

 

On the other hand, this fear of being “known” is not just a social concern; it can also be traced to the harsh economic reality of our daily lives. Especially in a country where Filipinos must constantly account for the rising cost of goods and services, as well as the price of working just to stay afloat, personal worth is often measured by our ability to produce. Thus, for the most part, once a mental health struggle is revealed, it is rarely viewed as a medical condition, but instead, seen as a faulty motor in a high-stakes economy that demands constant work. 

 

Take this data as food for thought: in 2025, the National Mental Health Summit presented that untreated mental health challenges cost the Philippine economy an estimated P68.9 billion annually in lost productivity. For the individual, this is a terrifying calculation because it is like saying that opening up about mental health is to be labeled as a liability or just a minor loss in productivity. It can make us appear less like human beings in need of care and more like a broken asset from the perspective of an employer or even a struggling family. 

 

Furthermore, even when we manage to deal with the economic risks of being exposed, we are often met with a moral ledger that is even harder to balance. In the Philippines alone, the concept of mental health is frequently measured in spiritual terms, where a diagnosis of depression or anxiety is mislabeled as a “lack of faith” or, as we often hear, “kulang sa dasal.” This observation is particularly relevant as a unique form of spiritual stigma, ultimately, happens when disclosing the struggle to the community or elders, hence risking being seen not as a patient but as someone who has failed spiritually. 

 

In fact, there was a study published in 2022 by Brillantes and Rodenas about the “Kulang sa Dasal” phenomenon, where they found out that a significant portion of the population still views spiritual practice as the primary, if not sole, remedy for psychological distress. This implies a heartbreaking choice of whether to be “known” but judged as spiritually weak, or to suffer in silence to maintain the love and respect of the community. It disproves the idea that each person is unique and that what is successful or limiting for one person may not be for another, such as depending on religion. That is why it is best to acknowledge that mental health is a complicated and diverse issue that is difficult to categorize or fit into a typical checklist.

 

If that is not enough, in the context of our national identity, we encounter the paradox of Filipino resiliency. From surviving natural disasters to enduring economic hardships, Filipinos are believed to be conditioned to see survival as their greatest virtue. However, this nationalistic trope creates a standard where love and admiration are conditional on staying strong. If our cultural value is built on being indestructible, then admitting to a mental fracture feels like a betrayal of the Filipino spirit itself. Therefore, the fear that “knowing me more leads to loving me less” is entirely grounded in a society that admires those who carry on without complaint. 

 

For all our innovations and hasty solutions we have perfected in this century, we have yet to engineer a tool that can automate the healing of the human spirit. We have moved forward in technology, but as we have seen, we have often moved backward in how we hold one another’s burdens. So, does knowing us more lead to loving us less? In a society that values utility over humanity, the answer is a horrifying “yes.” 

 

To truly love a person is to know their shadows, not just their productivity; it is to see them at their lowest and offer a hand instead of judgment. We must shift the cultural narrative so that being “known” does not lead to being distanced, but to being held. Only then can our advanced outlook finally catch up to our hearts, which can transform our shared identity from a source of shame into a sanctuary of genuine and unconditional love. 

Related Reads


What's New

Opinion
23 Sep 2026 34

More Articles